It is November and this year almost reached the end. There are several things you can see in the end of a year in campus. One of them is balloting.
Everywhere in the campus, it is easy to see candidates for the representatives of students and their fellows ask students to cast votes for them. Some of them wants to be the representatives in their departments and some wants to represent their college. They also put their photos on the walls and boards with their profile the promises for the next two semesters. Sometimes, they intrude classrooms before the class starts and promote their idea passionately.
People who are working hard are beautiful. If they don't play a fair game, however, they don't deserve to be praised. Lately, there was a heated discussion of the qualification of the candidate for the chief of the students' association. He was not eligible for the candidate because he was not registered in the university this semester. To make him as a candidate, the chief of election administration, who is the current chief of the students' association, changed regulation five days before candidates registration. After that was known to students, they were blame for trying to maintain their authority. The previous candidate resigned now and there is no one who registered as a candidate.
I don't know how it is going to be later and what is going to go on.
Even though I am going to graduate after this winter, I have a right for voting. I will have a look on the situation and make a right decision for my junior students.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That's very strange. I wonder why they tried to change the rules like that, but it seems very devious. That doesn't seem fair that he could run if he wasn't registered.
ReplyDeleteR